Law Seminars International Presents: Call from Anywhere for a One-Hour Expert Analysis by Phone on

American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.
Implications for copyright law and content delivery on the internet



July 1, 2014
Call in from Anywhere!
10-11 am Pacific / 1-2 pm Eastern

Who Should Call In

Attorneys and business executives involved with copyright and information technology

Why You Should Call In

On June 25, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit in ABC v. Aereo, finding that the Aereo service infringed the broadcasters' public performance right when it enabled subscribers to stream over-the-air broadcasts. The Court ruled that Aereo, not the subscriber, performed the broadcasts, and that these performances were to the public. Although the case concerned the transmission of over-the-air television, the decision also seems likely to impact cloud computing and a broad range of internet services.

The majority opinion, written by Justice Breyer, focused on the similarly of the Aereo service to traditional cable television services, and appeared to distinguish other types of services. The dissent, written by Justice Scalia, questioned the validity of Justice Breyer's "like a cable television service" analysis, and suggested that the Court's decision opened the door to litigation against a wide variety of legitimate services.

This one-hour TeleBriefing features analysis of the Court's decision in Aereo and expert advice for Internet companies on how the decision may affect their businesses. The discussions will be led by an expert group of practitioners that includes Jonathan Band, principal of policybandwidth and author of an amicus brief in this case in support of neither party. These experts will draw on their extensive experience navigating copyright infringement issues to provide valuable information for copyright practitioners and in-house counsel.

What You Will Learn

What Attendees Have Said About Similar Programs



Agenda

Tuesday, July 01, 2014

10:00 am

American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.

Introduction and overview

Jonathan Band, Esq., Moderator, Founder
policybandwidth / Washington, DC

Why the court is wrong and implications

Matthew Schruers, Esq., Vice President for Law & Policy
Computer & Communications Industry Association / Washington, DC

Why the court is right and implications

Hillel I. Parness, Esq., Founder
Parness Law Firm, PLLC / New York, NY

 
11:00 am

Q & A (for up to 30 minutes)

 


If You Cannot Dial In

An entire audio recording and the written materials are available for $150. You may choose to receive the files via email, on a CD or on a flash drive. Programs are available 48 hours after the TeleBriefing or from the date we receive payment. CD and flashdrive orders are sent via First Class mail within two business days after the TeleBriefing or from the date we receive payment. Order Homestudy

Tuition

Individual rate: $150

Group rate: $100 per person attending on the same line

Financial aid is available to those who qualify. Contact our office for more information.

Continuing Education Credits

This TeleBriefing qualifies for 1.0 Washington CLE credits. For CLE credits in other states:

We will apply for credits in the following states: AK, AL, AZ, AR, CA, CT, GA, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MO, MS, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, NY (experienced attorneys only), OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WI, WV, and WY.

You can self-report for credits in: CO, DE, FL, HI, MT, and NJ.

CLE credits currently are not available in: DC, MA, MD, MI, OH, or SD.

If you need other types of credits, please call us at (206) 567-4490.



Call In Info

The dial-in number and a link to the materials will be emailed to you the day before the TeleBriefing. All orders are processed within one business day of receipt.

Cancellation & Substitution

You may substitute another person at any time or receive a recording of the program (see If You Cannot Attend).



Our Distinguished Panel

Jonathan Band of policybandwidth, helps shape the laws governing intellectual property and the Internet through a combination of legislative and appellate advocacy. He has represented clients with respect to the drafting of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), the PRO-IP Act, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), and other federal and state statutes relating to intellectual property and the Internet. He complements this legislative advocacy by filing amicus briefs in significant cases related to these provisions. Mr. Band has also represented clients in connection to the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, the Marrakesh Treaty, and other international agreements. Previously, Mr. Band worked at the Washington, D.C. office of Morrison & Foerster LLP, including thirteen years as a partner.

Hillel I. Parness is a highly experienced commercial litigator and trial attorney who recently formed his own practice, Parness Law Firm, PLLC. He has represented a broad spectrum of domestic and international companies and individuals in a variety of industries. His clients have included major financial institutions, rapid-growth and technology-leveraged enterprises, and large entertainment and media companies. In particular, Mr. Parness has substantial experience assisting clients with issues arising from the intersection of emerging technology, media and the Internet, as well as matters arising from the complex business activities of both traditional and Internet-based businesses. In the Aereo case, Mr. Parness was co-author of an amicus brief submitted on behalf of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association, in support of the position of the television networks.

Matthew Schruers is Vice President for Law & Policy at the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), and an adjunct professor at the Georgetown University Law Center and the Georgetown Graduate School Program on Communication, Culture, and Technology (CCT).